563
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Tesla co-founder previously suggested Taiwan should become a ‘special administrative zone’ in China

Elon Musk, the owner of X/Twitter, was called out on his platform by Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs after calling the island nation an "integral part of China" and insisting that he understands "China well."

Mr Musk made the comments on the "All In" podcast while answering a question about China and the future of his involvement with the nation.

During the interview, Mr Musk said "I think I understand China well," and notes that he's been there several times and has met with high-ranking officials.

He then turns his attention to Taiwan, and compares its relationship to China to Hawaii's relationship to the US, insisting it is "an integral part of China that is arbitrarily not part of China”.

That comparison is flawed in two major ways: first, Hawaii is not a contested region, but is unquestionably a US state with all the same powers and freedoms granted any other US state; second, Taiwan's assertion that it is its own state is not arbitrary, but instead a position it has held for decades.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hanabie@sh.itjust.works 109 points 1 year ago

This guy really doesn't know when and how to shut up.

[-] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 33 points 1 year ago
[-] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I think people underestimating Musk is extremely dangerous.

Everyone underestimated Trump too and gave him 24/7 coverage because of how “stupid” he was.

Assume a powerful enemy is intelligent, or you’ll not understand how they got their power and will be perplexed as to how they grow it and how they will abuse it.

[-] vanontom@geddit.social 4 points 1 year ago

When relentless coverage of terrible people, and their insane words/actions, results in said people winning fair elections, I think the intelligence of the electorate might be the biggest problem.

But yes, that's beside the point, as is their growing mental illnesses and instability. The wealth/power they've been allowed to accumulate will always make them a danger/threat that should be taken seriously.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I'm just wondering why the U.S. DoJ isn't doing anything about it.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 year ago

Same reason the IRS spends all their time auditing poor people who made mistakes instead of auditing one billionaire for year. The metrics they're graded on aren't based on quality, they're based on quantity. Going after a billionaire is expensive, and sure, it would have lasting positive impact, but they're graded on number of cases closed

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Sure, but poor people aren't having influence over tense geopolitical situations.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 year ago

Exactly my point. We could spend 1 year auditing / investigating 1-2 billionaires and have way more government funding and way less foreign interference, but we don't because the system is working as intended

[-] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago

Well certainly not with THAT attitude!

[-] RelativeArea0@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well...this musk person is a well paid shill so...uhm yeah

¯_(ツ)_/¯

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
563 points (90.9% liked)

World News

39395 readers
2099 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS