285
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by briongloid@aussie.zone to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Appears to be Hetzner for now, wouldn't be surprised if all VPS get affected eventually.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aard 14 points 1 year ago

Without them forcing you to go through their server for user authentication it'd be a thing local to your network - where it wouldn't really matter. Without that stupid requirement you also could just keep unsupported clients running by yourself.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

But can't you already. Just allow unencrypted clients?

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
285 points (97.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40749 readers
762 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS