1657

As more and more details are being revealed about Rep. Lauren Boebert's wild night out in Denver last weekend — having been kicked out of "Beetlejuice" the musical for vaping and just generally being a public nuisance with her male companion — a full picture is coming together of what the other theater patrons around her that night had to endure.

Newly released footage of the night in question appears to show Boebert's exposed breasts being fondled by her date for an extended period of time while she, in turn, dawdles around in his lap with her hand. As many have pointed out on social media, having seen this footage, children were seated all around the couple that night, within viewing range of what they were up to.

"Laurent Boebert was jerking her date off in public while he gropes her in a theater where children were present and yet she continues to attack LGBTQ people as 'threats to children,'" writes journalist and clinical instructor Alejandra Caraballo on X, sharing the footage of Boebert in the act.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] febra@lemmy.world 188 points 1 year ago

Don't forget, people. It's always projection with conservatives. Next time you hear one scream about pedos, might as well start looking at their hard drives :)

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

do you guys not have an idiom for that?

in Hungarian we have (literally translated) : How one lives, thus they judge.

[-] Pencilnoob@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

A classic that kind of means the same thing is "me thinks he doth protest too much" from Shakespeare to indicate someone who brings up a topic they are guilty of.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Oh, this reminds me of “whoever smelt it dealt it”

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Basically the term projection serves the same duties. They accused people of the things they do. Projecting their behaviors on to others.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Methinks the lady doth protest too much"

Context: The Queen in his play-within-a-play is going into this really overwrought excessive speech about how much she loves the husband she is about to kill.

In this usage "protest" is not about publicly opposing something like the modern usage, it's more like "profess". A good modern equivalent might be "she's laying it on a little thick".

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We have acronyms

Gaslight Obstruct Project

[-] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 year ago

"Suspicion haunts the guilty mind." in Ireland. Don't know if it's an Irish saying translated to English like many others.

[-] Serdan@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Danish equivalent: Thief thinks each man steals

[-] coffeecoffeecoffee89@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

We do, but it is mostly used by children. "Takes one to know one."

[-] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Lefties sometimes say "every accusation is a confession."

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

Them having an itch and that's all what they preach in Russian as well.

[-] SolarNialamide@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

We have (very loosely translated) 'the innkeeper trusts his patrons as much as he trusts/knows himself' in Dutch. Or semantically more accurate would be 'an untrustworthy innkeeper distrusts his patrons'.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

We just call them “republicans”.

[-] blurryeyes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

In Mexico it's exactly like that "Como vives, juzgas"

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

GOP: Gaslight Obstruct Project

(Alternatively: Greedy Old Paedophiles.)

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

"If you smelt it you dealt it"

(A reference to flatulence)

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

There are a few specific Republicans I can think of where I'd love to have their computers/phones looks into...and not just to find their involvement/support of the coup for donnie.

[-] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They probably have illegal things on their computers/phones. Wouldn't be surprised as no Republicans are calling out Boobert (yes, with a o) or voted for people with questionable history.

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
1657 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19244 readers
3416 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS