182
submitted 1 year ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canadapolitics@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LostWon@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

My point was about them operating in countries under whatever rules apply in those countries. Put another way, Meta (like most corporations) will routinely follow authoritarian laws in any large market (such as those of the US and India) where they can stand to make a lot of money (from selling advertising). Generally if they don't, it will be either directly or indirectly profit-related.

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Right, but the example you gave never happened, you're thinking of when they were court ordered to hand over messaging data of a specific individual. This is normal in any messaging service and very different than actually looking through profiles to identify individuals who may have had an abortion.

And I don't want to come across as unsympathetic here, the laws in those states are truly fucked up, but of course they're following the laws and the court ordered data requests of the countries they operate in for citizens in that country. You wouldn't blame a doctor for not performing abortions in a state where it's illegal to perform abortions right?

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
182 points (95.5% liked)

CanadaPolitics

1928 readers
4 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules:

All of Lemmy.ca's rules apply

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS