994
submitted 1 year ago by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

The presence of picture 1 in no way prevents the presence of picture 2.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

It does if there's enough of them?

[-] Ulv@feddit.nu 7 points 1 year ago

No the people who own pictire one can and have shown they are willing too let them sit and rot rather than lower rent

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think the suggestion in picture one is for profit apartments owned by landlords.

[-] deur@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Let me know where I can find the homeless people tent encampments in the netherlands.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Public/social housing (presumably what's being proposed here) sure as hell would beat tent cities. Who the hell wants to stay in a tent rather than an actual home? Housing co-ops work if you've already got some amount of money, too.

[-] tpihkal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm having trouble telling the difference between the two.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
994 points (84.5% liked)

Memes

45902 readers
1762 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS