79
submitted 1 year ago by DevCat@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml

DENVER (AP) — Attorneys for former President Donald Trump argue that an attempt to bar him from the 2024 ballot under a rarely used “insurrection” clause of the Constitution should be dismissed as a violation of his freedom of speech.

The lawyers made the argument in a filing posted Monday by a Colorado court in the most significant of a series of challenges to Trump’s candidacy under the Civil War-era clause in the 14th Amendment. The challenges rest on Trump’s attempts to overturn his 2020 loss to Democrat Joe Biden and his role leading up to the violent Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

Oh he can talk all he wants. He just can't be elected, lol.

[-] BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Not being allowed to stand for office does not conflict or restrict his freedom of speech rights.

It's like a non us citizen saying the "natural born citizen" clause in the constitution conflicts with their right to free speech.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Don't be mistaken–being disqualified from standing for election is a restriction on his right to free political speech. However, this is a permissible restriction on free speech because the constitution (Amendment XIV) deems that those who engaged in insurrection should not be able to serve in office.

Trump's argument is similar to arguing that slavery is legal because it says so in the original constitution...disregarding the fact that a future amendment changed that.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

Slavery is explicitly still legal though in the 13th amendment.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Interpret my comment to mean chattel slavery

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
79 points (91.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7169 readers
431 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS