56
submitted 1 year ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/vancouver@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] otter@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Most of it was probably deciding whether to do it, and what company to contract etc.

I can't say why it took this long compared to a lot of other places, but some of the things to consider might be things like storage, making sure necessary data can be deleted, making sure it's kept private, logistics and unique requirements (privacy laws in Canada vs. wherever it's been implemented already), etc.

It's easy to strap a camera on a police office to have a proof of concept, it's harder to make sure it ALWAYS ticks off all the other boxes

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You and your perfectly reasonable takes! Good thoughts, thanks!

As I work in a large bureaucracy, I really should be more sensitive to these sorts of issues/considerations...

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You give them way too much credit. They were waiting to make sure other people departments had practices that allowed them to ignore the evidence if it worked against them and keep it if it helped the police. You know, like all of their other policies.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

Vancouver

1445 readers
30 users here now

Community for the city of Vancouver, BC

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS