1140
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nobsi@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Whats the source on it being about as bad?
It releases methane, yes.
We don't have to do hydro. Wind and the Sun are already plenty enough.

[-] nga105@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

UNs IPCC Reports https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/Chapter-5-Hydropower-1.pdf See fig 5.15. The outliers are the concern (and yes, it's pretty much methane)

Edit: I reread the parent comment, the above won't address what you asked for, but is interesting nonetheless so I'll leave it

[-] Nobsi@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the paper.
This does indeed clarify exact numbers that i didnt have.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy

Nuclear produces the least emissions over it's life cycle and has a safety rating that flip flops with solar depending on how they want to classify accidents in construction and preparation.

If you want a sustainable, clean and reliable future, your power grid needs Wind, Solar and Nuclear. There is absolutely no reason to exclude Nuclear Power from any green energy plan.

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1140 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

58735 readers
4069 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS