322

House Democrats on Tuesday said they do not plan to save Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) when a vote on ousting him from the top spot hits the floor later in the day.

Emerging from a more than two-hour meeting in the Capitol, House Democrats said they will vote to oust McCarthy from the Speakership.

“We are following our leader and we are not saving Kevin McCarthy,” Rep. Pramila Jayapal, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, told reporters.

Asked if a decision was made as a caucus not to support McCarthy, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) responded, “yes.”


This news follows McCarthy's statement that he won't give Dems anything to save his Speakership.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4235572-mccarthy-says-he-wont-give-democrats-anything-in-exchange-for-support-as-speaker/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 170 points 1 year ago

I think one of the most important statements McCarthy has said in this entire ordeal is this:

“I’m a Republican. I’m a conservative that wants to get things done. I know we live in – our government’s designed to have compromise, but look, we are in the majority. You don’t surrender,” he said..

This is another example of Republicans saying the quiet part out loud. Again. He blatantly and specifically said that the party knows they're supposed to be compromising, but they just don't want to.

It's sad to say, but this is what politics has become in this country. You're either in the majority or you might as well just stay home. But McCarthy himself has now said that compromise with the minority party isn't a thing, Democrats need to remember this next time they have full control. Fuck even attempting to compromise with Republicans as they've made it clear that they have no intentions of compromising with you when the shoe is on the other foot.

The Democrats need to seize full control in 2024, and when McCarthy isn't in power any more and complains about the Democrat majority, they can just respond by throwing his own words back at him.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 84 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

when McCarthy isn't in power any more and complains about the Democrat majority, they can just respond by throwing his own words back at him.

Didn't Rep. Katie Porter already throw his words back at him and point out his hypocrisy about starting an impeachment without a floor vote?

Same for McConnell when RBG died and was hastily replaced right before an election when Obama was denied an appointment with nearly a year left in his term. His hypocrisy was similarly called out.

In both cases, they don't care. I'm not saying we shouldn't call it out every time, but we shouldn't expect it to be some kind of "gotcha" moment either. They're completely unfazed by it, and the people who vote them in don't seem to care.

If I had a point when I started typing this out, I've lost it. lol

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

Having your words thrown back at you is a shaming tactic. They have no shame

[-] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, feels good but doesn't accomplish much. The time would be better spent getting on with the job of governing.

[-] Techmaster@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

You can't have shame without principles.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Nor do their rabid fanbase.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Oh, I know they don't care. All I'm saying is that every time he complains about the Democrat majority (and he will complain), the Dems can just respond by reading off his own quote, then going back to giving as much of a shit about his opinion as he's showing for theirs.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Don't read his quote. Don't give him any attention. Just act.

Any amount of time you spend on things that are not your priority is a victory for the other side. Don't spend a minute talking about him.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Democrats: "We are here in the House today to vote on........"

McCarthy/GOP (interrupts): "This is not fair. Republicans were not consulted on........"

Democrat speaker (interrupts): "Our government’s designed to have compromise, but look, we are in the majority. You don’t surrender. As I was saying, we are here in the house today to......."

That's it. No time wasted. Shut him down before he finishes his first sentence.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

No, just gavel them out of order. You can't legitimately interrupt the person speaking for any reason. That's the purpose of speaking time.

Everyone who cares will know who McCarthy was and what he said. Anyone who doesn't know doesn't care.

Republicans respect the use of power. They don't respect words. If you have the gavel, just use it.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I get the sentiment, but this would probably put off some people who aren't aware of the context. This might even be a trap where they hope those words are thrown back at them because they can use the optics to make it look oppressive rather than it being their own words sent back to them.

Any opportunity that makes them look like a victim, they will grab on to.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

They have no sense of public shame was what I gathered as the point of your post. So calling them out doesn't faze them.

It's still good to remind people of the hypocrisy, especially people on the fence.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Constituents have been saying this for decades, but every time one suggests anything left of milquetoast, BuT mUh BoTh SiDeS move-to-the-right-againers complain we’re not compromising. 🤷🏽‍♀️

[-] Neato@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

The issue is that a simple majority is pointless in US politics a lot of the time if the other party is OK with obstructing government and not compromising. You need a supermajority in both houses and the presidency to really get stuff done if the other party won't play ball due to the asinine filibuster rules. And if you don't have the presidency you need 2/3 in both chambers of congress to overrun the president's veto. Which the Republicans know and count on to keep democratic legislation stymied forever. The only way democrats gets shit done is with incredible concessions even when they are the majority.

But with how modern republicans are trying to fuck it all up and play ~~hardball~~ stupidball that doesn't seem to be working either. They aren't willing to concede or compromise on anything permanent.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Filibuster is only a Senate rule. A simple majority in the House can pass things with little the minority can do.

[-] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I think Biden has been able to get them to compromise occasionally, I think that's why he keeps trying. It's a case by case basis, Obviously, McCarthy can't be trusted so he isn't one to compromise with.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
322 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18992 readers
2267 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS