85
submitted 1 year ago by mondoman712@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 14 points 1 year ago

Gas companies are the biggest oligopoly. How can you "break free" from those corporations when you depend on a car to basic subsistence?

[-] Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 year ago

Yeah agreed, I'm all for getting rid of them too. Restricting peoples movement isn't the answer though

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 15 points 1 year ago

Like the restriction of movement car centric infrastructure impose kver everyone that dosen't bow to big oil and big auto.

[-] Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 year ago

What? Can you elaborate on how roads impose restricted movement on everyone?

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 year ago

I never said roads, I said car centric infrastructure. You can have roads without being car centric. And elaborating on that, car centric infrastructure restrict the movement on everyone who don't drive, for example poor people who can't afford a car, gas, insurance... or younger people who can't drive yet, or older and people with disabilities that can't safely drive.

[-] Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 year ago

How does it impede on those who can't drive? Because they're not allowed to move as freely as someone with a car? How would taking away everyone's car help that scenario?

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

have you ever been to an American city? everything is at the service of roads, cars, and space to park the cars. we have thoroughfares through residential neighborhoods, monstrous intersections that are unsafe to cross by foot, infrastructure that's unsafe to use by any mode of transportation that isn't a car -- because the cars will run you over -- and it's all wildly more expensive and less efficient than a functioning public transportation system. think of it like this -- if more people can get where they need to go by public transit, the roads won't be so congested.

[-] Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

Right, the road won't be so congested, but you have to run on a specific schedule and only go to specific places.

You have to pay for all of this somehow too, be it through fares at a toll or taxed by your gov. It won't be any cheaper running transit. Maybe even more expensive, because they still have to maintain the roads, but now the cost of vehicle repair is on the gov/Corp and not the individual. More tolls or more taxes.

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

a functioning public transit system covers the whole city, nearly point to point, and it runs on a regular schedule with buses and trains arriving every few minutes.

but who's going to pay for it???

it's really a good thing no one has ever run the numbers on this and there's absolutely no literature analyzing the costs of various forms of public infrastructure to determine which is the most cost effective. there's no way at all anyone has ever done that.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 year ago

run on a specific schedule and only go to specific places.

That describes 90% of all car trips too anyway. From your home to your job at 8am, to your job to your house at 5pm.

[-] Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

I go camping to random remote locations throughout the summer, sometimes you have to drive to find spots because they aren't really advertised online.

What about construction people? Do they need to rent a truck every time they have to drive to a job?

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 year ago

Do you care about people who can't drive? What's your solution for them?

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 year ago

Car centric infrastructure makes everything apart, so you can't walk anywhere, public transit is unfeasible because the low density, and biking is extremely dangerous. They are not only not allowed to move "as freely", they cannot movebat all. I don't know where you get this "taking everyone's car", you're the only one talking about it. You can can have infrastructure that is inclusive to everyone, even people with cars.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
85 points (85.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9887 readers
3 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS