942
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

No offense, but debs are just objectively better than rpms. I use both

[-] nekothegamer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

it doesn't matter which one is better, it's about compatibily, and there's no way to install .debs on, like, rpm based distros without getting completely broken uninstallable packages

[-] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Distrobox is the way. Running Fedora and I have debian and arch boxes (with their own home dir) installed. Graphical applications work without any fuss and I have yet to run into an issue.

[-] red@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I use Arch now but when I used Linux Mint, I used a rpm to deb converter sometimes, i don't know how, it always worked

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, that is why flatpak is a nice system

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
942 points (95.9% liked)

linuxmemes

20974 readers
69 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS