1150
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

No Man's Sky has you covered, in all the ways Starfield doesn't.

[-] SRo@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 1 year ago

Starfield isn't a great game but no man's lie is not better. Both are kinda shitty. Norman's sky was just way worse when it was released.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

NMS does exploration and procedural generation way better than Starfield

No mans sky is perfectly okay rn, I have no idea what you're talking about

[-] SRo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Good for you if you like it. It's still a soulless collectaton with meh building options and meh combat. It's better than it was at release but it's still a absolute average game.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The building options are also better than SF though. It's just much more intuitive and less grindy than Starfield is.

[-] American_Communist22@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I don't play it myself, my brother does. It seems fun for those who love exploration, and the worlds at least have some variety and the campaign holds more interest than that of starfields'.

Although yeah. At the end of the day we're a bunch of peasants who are arguing over which type of moldy bread is best, while the lords still get their money for the purchase.

[-] Starshader@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

No Man's Sky was terrible at launch.

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
1150 points (96.1% liked)

> Greentext

7584 readers
3 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS