399
submitted 1 year ago by flashgnash@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I get that it's open source provided you use codium not code but I still find that interesting

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] h_a_r_u_k_i@programming.dev 131 points 1 year ago

I hate Google but they gave us Go, Kubernetes. I hate Amazon but they gave us AWS. I plainly hate those companies, but adore the brilliant engineers that work there.

[-] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 41 points 1 year ago

Google is also one of the most prolific contributors to Linux, and was the #3 corporate contributor in 2022. If you're avoiding everything Google had a hand in you literally can't use any GNU/Linux.

[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

It's almost as though the beauty of open source is that it doesn't matter who contributes, we all benefit from the result because we can all check each other's work and all use what we want

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Google is perfect at getting rich by shipping disgusting 90% FOSS 10% Tracking software. Literally all their Android Apps are closed source tracking malware. AOSP gets nearly no attention. But yeah, good Platforms

[-] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, yes, the end products of GAFAM aren't designed to respect users' freedom, but rather to control them. That doesn't mean we can't extract the good parts of what they do and create user-respecting alternatives. Standard Android sucks but we have LineageOS and GrapheneOS, for example.

A tool, like any human creation, is imbued with the agenda of its creators. The freedom to share and modify the tool is what allows the community to override the initial creator's agenda. If free software comes with tracking malware the community will create a version without it. The community thus acts as a check against the power of the core developers.

This is why I'm against blindly rejecting anything that GAFAM has contributed to, as long as there is a freedom-respecting community version available.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Not to mention the Web itself. Google (and Apple and Microsoft) are major contributors to HTML as a standard.

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago

This is a very very good answer, and perfectly portrays my feelings, as well.

[-] jack@monero.town 7 points 1 year ago

Google is not deeply rooted in trying to harm the free/open software movement, unlike Microsoft. MS has always been the ideological enemy of Linux.

[-] victron@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago

So much they made WSL and made many developers happy. People acting like nothing has changed in more than 30 years.

[-] jack@monero.town 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How exactly is WSL helping anyone but MS? It's there so devs on Windows don't get tempted to try actual Linux

this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
399 points (90.0% liked)

Linux

48740 readers
1204 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS