Anti-intellectualism is stupidity

No. You have your definitions arranged sloppily. Stupidity is stupidity.

Grow the fuck up and stop defending stupid people.

I’m not defending anyone. Like at all. You being unable to see that is another indicator of how sloppy and undisciplined your mind is.

Colloquially, anti-intellectualism is the stance that intellectualism is bad. Intellectualism is not the same as intelligence. Intellectualism is a specific relationship with the mind and knowledge. Specifically it’s the belief that articulated argument and logic is the best way to approach knowledge. Anti-intellectualism is the stance that there are other ways far more valuable to develop knowledge.

For a bunch of self-proclaimed “intellectuals” you guys have no idea what you’re talking about.

Like being an intellectual and in favor of intellectualism is one thing. It’s another thing entirely to declare yourself an intellectual without actually being one.

In my experience, skilled intellectuals don’t call themselves that, and people who call themselves intellectuals are primarily interested in being seen as special.

Just to educate you a little on what the landscape is here, alternatives to intellectual consideration of reality include:

• intuition
• phenomenology
• practice
• empiricism
• idiocy

You’ve latched onto one of those, because apparently you don’t read enough to have any awareness whatsoever of the context of this conversation. Which is ahem rather anti-intellectual of you.