29
submitted 1 year ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jadero@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

Seems straightforward to me. It's pretty typical to permit testimony from those who were directly victimized. It's also pretty typical to permit impact statements from those indirectly victimized.

[-] TheMcG@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Exactly what I was thinking. This just sounds like it would be a victim impact statement which serves very standard.

I also fail to see how it could possibly be considered irrelevant.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

But your honour it would be devastating to our case!

[-] baconisaveg@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I think it would depend on what they're trying to charge him with.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
29 points (93.9% liked)

Canada

7164 readers
290 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS