260
submitted 1 year ago by 0x815@feddit.de to c/news@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

No one is saying "all these civilian casualties are ok", stop oversimplifilying the situation.

I know it's tempting to make blanket statements about moral imperatives from your armchair, religion has been doing that to us for centuries, but it turns out the real world is actually full of moral dilemmas, where there IS no outcome where no one dies, and all you can do is pick the least bad option.

"All civilian casualties are inadmissible" is the coldest of cold takes, right there next to, "well I don't think anyone should have a war at all!" Like, great, thanks, why didn't anyone think of that?

[-] ondoyant@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

i don't think anyone should have a war at all. there, are you happy? i'm frankly uninterested in litigating what hypothetical circumstances under which it might be okay to kill a civilian.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

No one was asking you to.

this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
260 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22048 readers
30 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS