158

Zoos aren’t for animals. They’re for us. | Zoos say they’re leaders in protecting wildlife. But is it true? (www.vox.com)

submitted 11 months ago by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/green@lemmy.ml

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] IMongoose@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

People can't even be expected to read stuff that pertains directly to their life and well being, can't expect them to read recreationally. But the zoo doesn't need attendees to read to give them money. That money goes into directly helping wildlife.

[-] Gloomy@mander.xyz -2 points 11 months ago

5 % of or, according to the article.

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 11 months ago

Which translates to millions of dollars a year, and doesnt account for the money spent maintaining the animals well being.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023

158 points (89.9% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5297 readers

1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!

RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

Related communities:

Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

theloneforager@lemmy.ml

Chloe@lemmy.ml