630
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fair enough, they aren't evil to be sure.

The Mozilla telemetry, pocket, Mozilla synchronization, experiments, the new tab page basically being an advertisement page. That leaves the sour taste in my mouth, so I don't trust them because of that... Shady good guy vibes:)

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

They're doing what they think they need to justify their existence, and although I personally believe being just a great browser would be enough I appreciate their communication around their ventures. It's not great, but it's not like they're installing malware in the background.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 23 points 1 year ago

And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn't worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today's day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google's PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it.

[-] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 1 year ago

https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/

They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don't install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don't trust them anymore.

I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it's impossible with them. So I don't. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That's what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web

[-] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Mullvad are a for profit company . Why do u donate to them ?

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They're just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed.

But yeah checking they're not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out

[-] clegko@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I dont get why everyone bitches about Pocket, tbh. Ive been a Pocket user for years and Mozilla's purchase of them has made them better if anything.

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I've always liked the idea of pocket and have tried to get into using it multiple times but sadly I'm a savage who hates even using bookmarks for some reason. I just keep all of it in my brain (which tends to mean I do not keep it at all).

[-] clegko@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It took me a long time to get used to pocket, not gonna lie. But once I did, I can't live without it.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
630 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

60130 readers
2790 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS