11
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by pathief@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Hey ~~fellas~~ friends. Sorry to create yet another post on this topic (maybe we should have a sticky for this?).

About 2 weeks ago I decided it was time to move on from Windows and installed Manjaro. I would consider myself a newbie-intermediate level linux user.

Though I've used Windows most my life, we use Linux servers (no GUI) at work, managing them is part of job description. I also own a late 2011 Macbook Pro with vanilla Arch Linux. I barely ever use it but boy, Arch really brought it back to life!

I've been reasonably happy with Manjaro so far, feels easy and intuitive to use but the community has made me aware that Manjaro is maybe a questionable choice. Since I don´t plan on distro-hopping a lot I want to get it right sooner rather than later.

Here's what I'm looking for:

  • Rolling distribution, preferably. Though this machine is also used for work, our environment depends mostly on remote servers anyway. I'd rather have a distribution that provides the most recent packages for whatever I want
  • I don´t mind running a distribution that forces me learn new things or do things in a different way, I kinda embrace it. I just don´t enjoy complexity for complexity's sake.
  • KDE is my preferred Desktop Environment so far, though I guess that's not very relevant. I'd love to run Hyprland, but you know.. Nvidia :(
  • I play games on Steam but from my understanding this doesn´t matter either. Everything I tried worked great, I don´t think I want a ¨gaming focused" distro or anything like that
  • No Ubuntu, please.

My hardware, in case you feel is relevant!

OS: Manjaro Linux x86_64 
Kernel: 6.5.5-1-MANJARO 
Shell: bash 5.1.16 
Resolution: 2560x1440, 2560x1440 
WM: KWin 
Terminal: konsole 
Terminal Font: MesloLGS NF 10 
CPU: 12th Gen Intel i7-12700K (20) @ 4.900GHz 
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Lite Hash Rate 
Memory: 23313MiB / 64087MiB 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] radix@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I'm just like you, newbie-intermediate Linux user who recently jumped from Windows to (Ubuntu then) Manjaro. What's wrong with Manjaro?

[-] pathief@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] radix@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks. Guess I'll have to look into EndeavourOS too, as commenters seem to be saying.

[-] pathief@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm glad this post that felt like spam actually ended helping someone

[-] radix@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

We have the same exact requirements, which is a first. No Ubuntu, must play nice with Nvidia GPU, KDE is nice, basically your entire list of preferences. I'm glad you posted, for one.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

Those "issues" were one time things that got fixed. Other than that, people seem to get a bee in their bonnet about "AUR compatibility".

There's no such thing. AUR stuff can and will break unexpectedly because it's compiled at one time against a transitory system state. It will happen whether you're on Arch or Manjaro. There's absolutely nothing in Arch that will prevent it.

[-] MrBubbles96@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Pasting an old reply of mine from another thread answering this same question:

Manjaro is…tricky.

I’ve called it an Arch based distro that kinda sucks at being an Arch based distro before, and I stand by that. You can’t treat Manjaro like you would EndeavourOS or Vanilla Arch Linux because of how Manjaro decides to do things: essentially, updates are held back by a couple of weeks for better and worse instead of being released as they’re made avaliable. While that means it can catch disastrous things like the GRUB issue another user pointed out (Manjaro was unaffected by it IIRC), it also means the system is prone to breaking itself more often. And you can forget about using the AUR if you’re using Manjaro–or well, you can, but the AUR and Manjaro are nortorious for not playing nice with one another because of the latter’s tendencies to hold back packages, which, natrually, leads to even more breaking.

Personally, I wouldn’t recomend it. However, If you don’t mind being extra careful with what you install (really that’s standard practice for any distro, but hey, I’ve never found a WIP package that messed up my system anywhere other than when using Manjaro, so make of that what you will), are willing to tolerate constant mild to severe breakage, and just using Flatpaks and appimages over the AUR, then give Manjaro a try, but otherwise? Go with EndeavourOS, or Garuda, or literally anything else.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

I've been using Manjaro for years with zero issues. Far fewer than using Arch for example.

[-] MrBubbles96@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I can only speak to my expierence with Manjaro, and it was....not good. It pretty much found a way to uniquely break itself every boot from me...just treating it like I would Arch (i didn't find out how you're maybe supposed to use it till later, when i moved on to another distro). And in every Manjaro post or comment, there's several anecdotes that are similiar to mine: somehow, someway, Manjaro freaked out and died...and then there's a couple that are like yours: "I've used it for several years with zero problems" and i gotta ask: how? Legit curious. Is "waiting 14 days to update + not using the AUR at all, if possible" sound advise or am I waaaay off the mark?

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

It sounds equally weird to me to hear about people breaking Manjaro and I feel like I should be the one asking "how?" 🙂

There's no need to wait 14 days to update, I update whenever I feel like it. And there's no need to hold back from using the AUR, I have 76 AUR packages installed right now.

The only rule about AUR is the same rule they recommend on Arch too: don't use it for critical packages. So don't install kernels from AUR, or graphical drivers, or replace system packages with AUR stuff. Because AUR stuff will break, it's not a question of "if" it's a question of "when", and it will happen on Arch just as well as any Arch derivate.

Other than that I can't think of any reason why a Manjaro install would spontaneously break. Perhaps if you install an experimental kernel as the only kernel on your machine and it breaks? I've always stuck to LTS kernels myself, and I keep two LTS installed, just in case.

[-] giacomo@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I'm in the same boat; been using Manjaro on my desktop for years without anything really breaking. I've told myself that when it does break and I can't fix it I'll distro hop again, but it just hasn't been the case yet.

[-] radix@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the detailed explanation. I haven't had any issues in my few weeks with it, but I don't want to wait until issues do show up.

Honestly I was just in love because the wifi just worked somehow without me having to port over drivers via USB dongle from my laptop.

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
11 points (60.4% liked)

Linux

47764 readers
838 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS