1183
submitted 1 year ago by Gork@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Just follow the sources then. Everything that should be credible is backed by sources, and if you can't believe that source then ignore it , or admit your trust issues.

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

What is, on a controversial issue, one side is presented with sources, and the other side is not mentioned at all or given just a brief overview?

This often happens on Wikipedia, even when the editors aren't trying to be biased. Suppose there was a dispute between the British Empire and a small tribe in South Africa. The British side of the story will have a lot of sources, most in English. The tribal side will most likely be known only to locals, with maybe some articles in Zulu and one in Dutch. How do you think the Wikipedia article will look?

To be fair, Wikipedia is trying to enact policies to address such biases, but there is still a lot of work to be done.

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
1183 points (86.1% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
2683 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS