536
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HidingCat@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

As much as USA is pro-gun, I thought automatics are not sold?

Regardless as the other comment says, firing on full auto is a waste of ammo. Back in service our first range practice we were given the Rambo-fantasy; hip firing at full auto at 10 metres out. No one hit any of the targets. It was a lesson to us that firearms, as easy as they are to use, needed at least some skill to be effective.

[-] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[-] DaCookeyMonsta@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Caveat: There are ways to simulate full automatics (e.g. bump stock), and also some guns can be converted into full automatic.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Trump banned bump stocks. It's the only gun control that's held up in court in around 20 years.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Now look up full auto sears for $25

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Yes full auto weapons used to be trivial to buy, it's been more than 20 years since that was the case.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Look up lightning link and realize you're an idiot

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Technically no. You can still get a fly automatic but they are expensive as hell. A cheaper solution would be a bump stock but that is even less accurate than an automatic. You could also illegally build your own.

As for ability to hit targets, how close together and how many were the targets? If it is a few targets spread out over 10-20 meters, yeah going full auto is going to miss a lot. Having dozens of people packed into a small area makes accuracy less important.

[-] HidingCat@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~What's a bump stock?~~ Went to read about them; the inventing company has stopped making them, are they still easy to get?

They popped up the range targets, so not as tight as a packed crowd, but you'd think at least one would get hit. My impression was that it was really hard to control the recoil making the barrel going up, so most of my rounds just went over the targets.

[-] ChronosWing@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

No because they are illegal. The only thing good to come out of the Trump admin.

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Full auto guns can be purchased. Most often they’re prior 80s ban guns. They’re older generally, although there are some newer full auto guns that have been hitting the market lately. They all require you to have full background checks and they’re serialized to match. The ATF is the one though that you have to register through to legally acquire one and from what I’ve heard it’s kind of a bitch to get approval on them (as it should be).

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago

How have there been newer full-auto weapons on the market? I thought everything registered after 1986 was banned (not technically, but the ATF wouldn't approve the tax stamp to register anything after 1986).

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

For the general public, there aren't. If you want a machine gun of new manufacture, you have to go through the whole process to be licensed as a manufacturer, SOT, FFL type whatever. I forget exactly. And you have to show you're actually doing business to get and keep that license.

[-] mnoram@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Were there 100 targets all right next to each other all within 50ft?

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
536 points (96.9% liked)

News

23669 readers
3424 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS