1002
Well, this is something! (files.mastodon.social)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/europe@feddit.de

Meanwhile in Germany:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Waker@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm Portuguese and as much as I'd love to run on 96% green energy I can't believe it... Last time I checked (it was quite a while ago I'll give them that) we imported a lot of nuclear energy from France. So unless France is 100% green and still has a green energy surplus (which it isn't/doesn't) we're just transfering our carbon footprint...

We do have a lot of wind turbines so maybe we don't import as much anymore but still...

[-] localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago

Nuclear is green though, so France is a good place to be importing from. It also has the lowest mortality rate per kWh of all power sources, Chernobyl included.

[-] Waker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not saying nuclear isn't green btw.

I, personally, am all for nuclear. However given the choice I'd rather my country invests in wind geothermal, solar and others. Nuclear can be a liability as we've seen in Ukraine.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Is Portugal a good place for wind energy? It seems like it should be with a long coastline that faces west from Europe.

I can't wait for the day when places that have renewable energy advantages become net exporters, supplying renewable power to the rest of the world.

[-] Waker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yep! Maybe not the best overall in Europe, but we do have some strong winds and also very sunny days so solar energy is also easy to come by.

In one of our archipelagos (Azores) we also have geothermal power plants since we have active vulcanos there.

Aditionally I think there were some major developments in harnessing the ocean's waves so on that front, I think we would absolutely crush it.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

That's awesome. I wonder if the mountains would also make pumped hydroelectric possible too, so Portugal could use a clean method of storing power for when the wind was calm and the sun wasn't shining.

[-] Waker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hopefully one day :)

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

When it comes to saving the environment, and considering you're in the EU, the liability of nuclear as seen in Ukraine is minimal

[-] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Novaya Kahovka power plant is very not nuclear tho

Spoiler alertIt is hydro power plant.

[-] Waker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well that was just an example anyways. I thought it was nuclear but I might be wrong, never really looked too much into it.

Any nuclear power plant can become a liability during war times though. Hopefully it never comes to that, but you never know...

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think there's a nuclear power plant in Ukraine a lot of people know about in Chernobyl or something maybe? I'm guessing that's what they're hinting at.

[-] TalkingCat@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago

I don't know about the others but I don't think I can really consider solar green, it needs a lot of silicon not only to make enough panels to have an impact but also needs the extraction of stuff for batteries too, still better than coal ig.

[-] wewbull@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago

Oh no. It needs lots of sand.

What's the problem with silicon?

[-] Waker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I still think in the long run it's worth it. Maybe not as good as wind I guess, but 100% better than gas/oil/coal etc...

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

There's definitely some figure manipulation going on here. Portugal might claim it's importing green energy from France, meanwhile France might stack up its renewable generation against its overall demand to make its claims, meaning both are ignoring much of the fossil fuel generation from France.

It's still good progress, but the devil really is in the details. There's a reason this post doesn't call it "net-zero" or any other industry recognised term.

[-] Claidheamh@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The biggest chunk of our yearly consumption is still gas. And France's carbon intensity is much lower than ours still (one of the lowest in Europe), so any energy we're importing from them is actually lowering our CO2 average.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
1002 points (93.7% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS