-5
submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Same bullshit as always. No one will end up paying an amount that will "re-pay" sufficiently. Instead it just goes back to hoping tech advancments move us to cleaner energy quickly.

(Aka. If they were going to pay x per footprint, they instead would pay x/y)

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

(Aka. If they were going to pay x per footprint, they instead would pay x/y)

... okay so x/y is the same as x per y

meters per second = meters / seconds

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
-5 points (14.3% liked)

World News

32220 readers
551 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS