To be honest, if he was, by his own admittance, standing on a public sidewalk for 30 minutes with his gear, then he earned that loitering fine.

When asked under what circumstances Quebec City police will arrest or fine someone for loitering, Dion said “it’s on a case-by-case basis,” and "it’s up to police officers’ discretion.

So he didn't earn anything other than a cop randomly choosing that he was loitering. There is no written definition circumstances in which someone can be classified as loitering. There are tons of people who do the same, if not worse, and are not subjected to this undignified arrest and fine. If a different cop were to show up and have a different opinion, he'd have never gotten the fine. If you cannot concretely say that "This is what you have broken" and "This is why it is wrong" then there should not be a punishment for it.

This was also explained to him and it written on his ticket, so he’s contradicting himself by saying they never explained what law was broken.

He is not contradicting himself. The person who refused to say what bylaw was broken was a completely different person with a different name. I'd suggest reading the article in future so you don't make such mistakes.

Being a professional photographer doesn’t give someone the right to take ownership of the public space.

He never claimed ownership of the public space.

if they didn’t stop him after 30 minutes, he could have been there for hours.

He said that the sun came out while he was in the cruiser and he missed the shot. So if anything, the police kept him at this place even longer.

Either way, he’s acting entitled.

For wanting to use a public space and expecting fair/impartial application of the rules? And clear rules to begin with? Lolno