154

Muslim voters disillusioned with President Biden’s position on Israel are facing the prospect of a difficult choice in 2024.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

People shouldn't vote for genocide. If your choice is between Hitler and Satan it's ok to not vote, or heaven forbid, support a third party.

[-] panda_paddle@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Every election year I hear about this magical 3rd party that will save us from our shit choices. The only thing a third party would do is split democratic voters, leading to even more republican wins. Despite what left leaning media bubbles say, Republicans are not unhappy. They don't want a 3rd party for themselves and they will keep voting R until the grim reaper rips them from this plane of existence.

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Demonstrably false. Check the rfk polls.

[-] panda_paddle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

The people supporting rfk are the same nutjobs who supported Stien and Johnson. Those are not conservative losses.

[-] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Abstention and 3rd party choices are indirect support for the candidate you'd least prefer.

Both choices might be a shit sandwich, but the US system just doesn't support not eating one, so it might as well be the one you'd rather than the alternative.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I wonder if Democrats are gonna realize that eventually people get to the point where they will no longer eat shit.

[-] Notorious_handholder@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah then they switch to eating the douche, then switch back to the turd. It's just a constant flip flop between the worst choices cause the electoral college and fptp voting we use are a cluster fuck that leads to terrible results and nobody except the wealthy getting what they want. Because people can't be bothered with understanding cause and effect of actions and policies because the people on the tv told them what to think already.

And then Republicans cut taxes to rich again.

And then democrats don't do or can't do anything again

And the Republicans raise taxes for everyone else

And then democrats still do nothing except maybe hint at giving us free health care

And the Republicans repeal climate change bills

And the democrats still do nothing but act like maybe they might legalize weed even though they wont

And then a school gets shot up

And then no one cares

And then Republicans are elected

And then democrats are elected

And on and on the world turns and we confirm time is just a flat circle where we do the same thing over and over again until we all die or start a revolution and then watch the same cycle repeat just with new names.

Everyone constantly bickering over stupid shit not realizing the real issues are caused by the people high up in the ivory towers holding all the wealth and resources

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A popular sentiment, but not among historians.

Third party voting in US politics has resulted in numerous labor and civil rights. women's suffrage, social security, 8 hour workday, etc.

Just another time when academia conflicts with your typical op-ed. A third party vote is probably the most powerful one you can make.

[-] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

In the 2024 presidential race, if anyone who would otherwise vote for Biden, from any state that is not 100% safe, chooses not to over basically any issue(s), they improve the odds of an R, with a worse stance on that issue, winning the election. Ideology can take a long walk off a short pier when sobering reality comes knocking.

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Your assumptions are doing a lot of work here.

It's an entirely different strategy:

A) I'll vote for you no matter what you do!

Versus

B) You must earn my vote.

The progressive policies I outlined above became law because the two major parties grew tired of losing close races, and decided to earn some third party votes.

[-] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

"Earn my vote" is the bullshit mentality that led to Trump being president. Fuck all of that. R's are batshit, and if someone doesn't commit a vote that can matter against them, that person's part of the problem when R's win.

There is literally NO issue where someone who would normally vote for Biden has a better option under any realistic R candidate.

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Rather than shaming people into eating shit, perhaps you could shame Biden into supporting a policy that has popular support in swing states.

Keep in mind that most low income people were materially better off under Trump, whose pandemic policies resulted in the lowest childhood poverty rate since the 90s. (These welfare policies were cancelled or expired under Biden.) So a Biden preference, if it exists, may not be as strong as you assume.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

Plus, Republicans work really hard to prevent people from voting in the first place. By not voting, you do the very thing they want.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago

I'm sure the people whose lives are destroyed by Republican fuckery will appreciate your principled stance.

[-] sub_ubi@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago

Sorry dude, my line is genocide. Not sure what yours is.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm sure you actually believe you're making a morally superior choice, but I disagree. Your sanctimony has no basis.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
154 points (83.8% liked)

politics

19002 readers
3937 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS