1026
Yes, also Teslas (media.mastodon.scot)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] adj16@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

Ugh guys come on, don’t let perfect be the enemy of good (or better). We cannot snap our fingers and fix everything. Incremental steps are necessary.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

Local commuter rail, walkable cities, and nationwide high speed rail are all necessary to completely eliminate 90% of individual car ownership. We should be advocating for these systems of convenience which will make car ownership obsolete while incentivizing EVs while the infrastructure is built up, not demonizing EVs and making them appear as useless and a waste of time for helping fight climate change. Plus we need EV utility vehicles and trucks for professionals who need them to do their job.

[-] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Incremental steps are not personal EVs. They are diesel and electric buses. EVs eliminate 1 problem (tailpipe emissions) while creating 2 more (battery manufacturing, increased vehicle weight making road and tire wear worse, and making them more deadly - there's others, take your pick) and not addressing the other hundred problems with car dependence.

Buses use the same infrastructure as cars. Bus stops are stupid cheap in comparison to anything else. And then, bus lanes can be implemented to prioritise buses and keep them from getting stuck in traffic.

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The number one (by a long way) selling vehicle in the US is a massively over sized truck. Designed to be so heavy to avoid falling under emissions laws.

There is no electric vehicle that comes even close to that. You want those people interested in electric cars. They don't give a single fuck about what your think about buses and nothing you will ever do in your lifetime will change that. Ever.

Getting people into EVs is an across the board incremental improvement in the exact definition of the word.

You're right about the massive benefits of transit and trains in particular would be so amazing.. but none of the people we want getting out of F150s give a single shit.

[-] cousinDanny@mastodon.social 6 points 1 year ago

@xenoclast @ProgrammingSocks once you add a weight tax and special license qualifications they might start changing their tune

[-] daltotron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but they're also a pretty big part of the voter base, so how would you get that passed?

[-] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't care about getting people into things. That's a highly individualistic way to look at the problem. Car dependency is a societal problem, and marketing won't solve societal problems. There needs to be a fundamental change in the way we (specifically the government) view transportation as a whole. (And as an extension to that, there also needs to be a change in regulation to close that loophole for light trucks.)

What's important to me is getting lawmakers and those advocating to the lawmakers on board with funding public transit and making the streets safer for all people using them. Yes we need people on board too but really only enough to get these ideas in lawmakers heads as a major issue. A minority. The majority of people don't understand or care and that's fine, because their minds will start to change once they see it actually working. In the words of NJB, there are not that many car people, bike people, or train people. Most people just want to get to their destinations as quickly and efficiently as possible.

We don't live in a direct democracy. 51% don't have to explicitly agree to laws. The government passes laws that are bad for people and the majority disagree with all the time. Not saying the majority of people disagree, I honestly think they couldn't care less. I'm just saying we don't actually have to recruit hundreds of millions of people.

Unfortunately, a major part of this plan is going to have to restrict what oil companies are allowed to do and nowadays that's seemingly impossible. Only seemingly though. Nothing is truly set in stone.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Ok you try riding the bus everywhere with your whole family dude. That's not happening. It's incredibly inconvenient. Especially given the infrastructure we have.

I'm loving my electric car and hope you all get one.

[-] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Having been to the UK and Germany, it's incredibly convenient and much quicker than driving in many cases. I've used the metro where I live and it's also much quicker, the only issue is the closest bus stop is 20 minutes away by foot. That's easy to fix though.

[-] thoughts3rased@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

I live in the UK, and I can say it depends greatly on your circumstances.

In general, if you're traveling between an outside town to a city it's usually an alright experience.

However, if your commute is between two outside towns then you have to be lucky, otherwise a car ends up being the only real viable option. My work is about 15 miles away, and before I had a car I had the only option of a railway line that ran through my town. If that line ever had issues getting cancelled or on the train strikes were on that day I couldn't get to work because to get my work was 2 buses and 2 hours to go 15 miles. The train ran once an hour and didn't call at half the stops on a Sunday including the stop I needed for work so if it was a Sunday I literally could not get to work.

It's not even cheaper than a car when I factor in leisure travel, many places I regularly go to take longer to get to by car and are usually a worse experience whether that be service infrequency, long layover times or services getting cancelled/being on strike.

[-] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh sure, I agree that it's not always perfect, but neither is driving. I can't tell you how many times I've been randomly stuck in gridlock because someone got in a crash on the freeway.

The issue here is entirely that there is no choice that can be made. You either drive, or you don't go anywhere. I don't want to need a car, I want to want a car. Cars are convenient, but when they're required to do literally everything then they're a massive inconvenience.

If I was able to make a choice, I could share a car with someone else. As it stands, we both have to own one.

Having lived in Germany, you obviously didn't meet enough people. They fucking love thier cars dude. Yeah their buses are better, but I was shown many people's cars as if they were a child.

[-] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh sure, obviously people like cars, but in the cities we'd park and switch from car to rail because it's significantly faster. I also stayed in the city for a couple of weeks and didn't need a car at all.

Compare that to the US where you need a car or you die, even in the city, and it's not even a contest.

[-] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago

I have an electric vehicle. I ride it everywhere in my city and it costs basically nothing. It's an ebike. I've done nothing to it, it's a normal 350w motor capped at 32 km/h. And damn does it feel so much better than driving in traffic.

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

It's not that perfect (public transport) is more difficult than good (electric cars). More often good is the enemy of perfect since the industry is lobbying for it and against the other

Hence mocking Musk instead of guillotining him.

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
1026 points (88.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9890 readers
2 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS