197
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

So, he basically did the same thing that McCarthy did? I don't remember if it got brought up before, but does Johnson still have to worry about getting deposed on a whim, or did they not include that this time?

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago

He did exactly what they threw McCarthy out for and Democrats got everything they wanted, Republicans got nothing of what they wanted.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

I think this could be looking at it from the wrong perspective. To me, Johnson's rise to speaker looks like a calculated effort by Christian Nationalists (aka MAGA) to position a future coup leader and presidential candidate. McCarthy is an unpopular career politician, where Johnson is a younger unkown on the national stage. The Conservative propaganda machine tried to position DeSantis as Trump's successor, but he's proved a total failure.

Calling it now. Johnson will run for president in 2028 and, depending on polling, could be Trumps VP pick. He wouldn't think twice about doing what Pence failed to do on Jan 6.

[-] Spacebar@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Trump will be 82 and in jail or dead by 2028.

[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Stop it, I can only get so erect!

[-] lipilee@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

Don't threaten us with a good time!

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Some scandal will tank him before he gets that far. I heard rumors a male escort is going to come forward about a relationship with Mike Johnson. Not saying that's true, but it's just a matter of time before something comes out.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

and Democrats got everything they wanted

Except funding for Ukraine and a better timeframe.

[-] Kolrami@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This deadline is longer than the previous funding bill's deadline and the added attention on the Israel-Hamas conflict has given factions on both sides something to compromise on: No funding for Ukraine in exchange for no funding for Israel. It's a bit weird, but it worked out for Johnson.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I was countering the assertion that Democrats got everything they wanted. They did not.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Well, it still has to go through the Senate

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Oh. So there's still a chance to make it worse.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

Last I saw, McConnell was pressing for funding Ukraine. Whether he'll have to compromise or ever intended to fight for it is anyone's guess.

[-] shiftenter@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

It's still in place: https://www.axios.com/2023/10/29/johnson-gop-house-speaker-rule

The far righters weren't happy and voted against this. But they said they weren't going to kick him out because of it.

[-] dephyre@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago
[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

gaetz caught the car last time, he will stay in three yard this time.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

It seems that that may have mostly been a guise for how much the Freedom Caucus personally hated Kevin McCarthy more than anything.

You have to remember, these people don't actually have principles or goals.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Principles no, goals yes. Their goal is autocratic power for autocratic power's sake.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Basically, they are acting like school kids. Class might not calm down for the substitute teacher, but when the principal shows up they suddenly behave.

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
197 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2110 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS