167
submitted 1 year ago by RehRomano@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

That is the point though, if like the article says l, 1/5th of owners have an investment property, they could sell it and still live in the current place and have a ton of cash. or sell both and move to a cheaper city and retire. Compared to people struggling to save for a mortgage in this crazy market.

[-] villasv@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1/5th of owners have an investment property, they could sell it and still live in the current place and have a ton of cash

That's fair, and the article goes through a few key points that I agree with. The article title is just clickbait, but annoying because it's alienating. I don't think it makes sense to write a headline based on 1/5th of that group being land speculators.

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"1/5 of Homeowners Refuse to Accept the Awkward Truth: They’re Rich"

Or

"Multi-property Homeowners Refuse to Accept the Awkward Truth: They’re Rich"

Or

"Multi-property owners Refuse to Accept the Awkward Truth: They’re Rich"

Or

"Landlords and Spectors Refuse to Accept the Awkward Truth: They’re Rich"

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

It made us both click on it :)

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
167 points (81.0% liked)

Canada

7299 readers
1031 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS