174
submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KinNectar@kbin.run 24 points 1 year ago

You know what would be amazing, if a third party candidate would run and then demand policy position concessions form the Democratic nominee in exchange for dropping out, rather than running through the election and risking a Republican presidency.

[-] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The green party is routinely funded by the GOP. Their existence is to be a spoiler and pull votes from Dems to swing races towards republicans.

They’re already doing what they’re being paid to do.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That's kinda what the WFP does?

They have a sort of tacit agreement with the Dems where they'll run their candidates in the Dem Primary pool and then both will endorse the winner, and then they'll only compete directly when there's no chance it'll throw a race to the Republicans.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think that's the only rational way to interpret her run. Even she doesn't want to run through.

Edit: I checked her record on previous runs, and omg I was so wrong...

[-] KinNectar@kbin.run 7 points 1 year ago

Yyyyyep, she's a regular Nader type, unfortunately.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

How on the hell do Green party members stand behind her? Her leadership undermines all the good intentions of the party policies.

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
174 points (80.4% liked)

News

23669 readers
3475 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS