1372

Twitter is threatening legal action against the Center for Countering Digital Hate, a nonprofit that researches hate speech and content moderation on social media platforms.

The letter from Twitter's lawyers alleges that CCDH's research publications are intended to 'harm Twitter's business by driving advertisers away from the platform with incendiary claims.'

This is a pretty bold move from Twitter, especially considering that CCDH is a well-respected organization that has been doing this kind of research for years. And it's especially ironic coming from Elon Musk, who has said that he's a 'free speech absolutist.'

But Musk has also shown that he's sensitive to criticism, so it's not surprising that he's taking this kind of action against CCDH

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

I really think all the artists still on there are shooting themselves in the foot in the long run.

And that obviously has already started with the direct messaging restrictions that messes with contacting commissioners.

[-] klyde@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

If they leave Twitter, where are they going to go? Artists need to promote themselves. They sure aren't coming here to promote themselves. Twitter has always been where people go to keep up with their favorite artists whether it be art, music, comedy, etc. If they leave then they're shooting themselves in the foot. Twitter is still massively popular even if you don't agree. Same goes for Reddit.

People who have made a living promoting themselves on Twitter aren't going to leave it just because Musk is a dumbass. Most artists as you mention typical have business emails in their profiles. Until Musk does something to fuck with their income, they're staying.

It's the same shit when people on Reddit say they're abandoning COD this year because the devs pissed them off only for the game to have the highest sales ever. You, me, Lemmy users, and Reddit haters are just a fraction of the people who use those sites.

[-] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Mastodon? Pixiv? Deviantart? Artstation?

[-] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Mastodon is a good pick to keep in the back pocket but it doesn't have mass adoption yet, and all the others are art-dedicated websites. The advantage of Twitter was that it made it easy for their art to be shared widely but linked back to their account so that regular people just browsing would get to know their work and maybe follow them through it. Anyone regularly browsing those other websites are already art enthusiasts so that's not so effective to expand their audience.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It won't have adoption until it gets adopted. And the only way for that to happen is for people to adopt it of course. What probably needs to happen is for someone to write a simple app to either post to both at the same time or something that someone could run themselves or pay an inexpensive nominal fee for someone else to run for them to mirror their posts.

[-] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That was made harder because Twitter now charges for their API. Some people are trying to do both manually, but they can't entirely move away since their livelihood depends on maintaining their audience.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We did these sort of things before apis. They will be possible when all apis are gone still.

[-] mycatiskai@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They (celebrities) would have the biggest pull to get people moved onto one of these new services.

I know nothing short of the names as I don't need that kind of app or service but if one of these new places like blue sky or mastadon had an easy way to get signed up for the masses then someone like Taylor Swift saying she was signing up and to join her there as she drops twixxter then millions of people would sign up in days.

[-] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The issue is that not every artist is a celebrity.

Sure Taylor Swift can move a lot of people, but some upcoming niche artist can barely hold onto the little audience they built even by staying there.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

"Twitter has always where people go to keep up with their favorite artists..."

Somehow fandoms managed to exist before 2007.

[-] Wander@yiffit.net 2 points 1 year ago

Wait what restrictions? Can you no longer DM an artist?

[-] veloxization@yiffit.net 12 points 1 year ago

From what I have seen/heard from people still on there, there's a new setting that only allows you to receive DMs from "verified users" (i.e. Twitter Blue subscribers). You are automatically opted into this and have to opt out to receive DMs from others.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
1372 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
2668 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS