37

Which do you think is the better microblogging platform? Why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

one of the misskey forks. imo "vanilla" misskey is lacking a fair bit of essential stuff (post editing being a giant one)

the most interesting ones to watch for now are iceshrimp (misskey v12 hardfork based on an early version of firefish, mainly focused on backend tech work compared to new features) and sharkey (misskey ”v13” softfork, aimed at qol changes and other feature work while keeping up to date with misskey itself)

akkoma is alright if you need something light on resources but I personally can't get used to it's interface

and mastodon is just... too bland in comparison to both

[-] nix@merv.news 7 points 1 year ago
[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I personally find the development to be more "sensible". firefish bungled up their flagship with a (imo) failed transition to scylladb and hasn't been doing much of importance since then (they changed the boost icon to a rocket though!)

compared to that, iceshrimp rewrote their mastodon api compatibility layer to the point where it may be the most compliant one among misskey forks, uncovered several perf bottlenecks (one really big one related to word mutes since fedia migrated over), fixed the http signature security vuln ahead of firefish (and provided the patch to them, which they didn't put in a stable release for something like two days even after merging)

quite a lot of firefish instances seem to be migrating over to sharkey for similar performance and stability reasons, but if you like the firefish UI/UX compared to the "classic" misskey one (or want a smoother migration path from firefish that doesn't involve a major version bump) then iceshrimp is the one to check out imo

[-] nix@merv.news 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, thanks for the writeup. Definitely sounds like the better option.

Them not having a flagship instance or a website that lists iceshrimp instances makes it difficult to try though.

[-] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

https://fedidb.org/software/iceshrimp is a thing, and there are several general purpose instances such as fedia.social and iceshrimp.social (which isn't anything official despite the name)

not having an (open) flagship is, to the best of my knowledge, an intentional choice as moderating it would take time away from development

[-] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Iceshrimp seems more stable than FF

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
37 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

28746 readers
49 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS