-1
submitted 1 year ago by Blursty@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Did you read your own source?

The current conclusion of the State Department lawyers does not constitute a judgment that genocide did not occur in Xinjiang, but it reflects the difficulties of proving genocide, read the report.

[-] Blursty@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Yes I read that part. They have no evidence but still want to pretend to believe it, like so many others.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So the global hegemon with the ability to spy on a single square foot of the earth from space 40 years ago is struggling to prove a conjecture that would harm its geopolitical rival, not because the claim lacks evidence and is politically motivated, but because proving this shit is hard? Is that what you're saying?

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
-1 points (33.3% liked)

World News

32563 readers
575 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS