113
submitted 10 months ago by _number8_@lemmy.world to c/general@lemmy.world

genuinely helpful and honestly meaningful (especially if you're going to invest any level of your mental health in posts (which i don't recommend but is natural if you try to post what's on your mind)) being able to see like, oh even if 20 people downvoted me, 7 people agreed with me, i have seven fighters. it's so much better to see that and get a fuller picture of how your comment was received.

i remember seeing reddit make that change out of nowhere for no reason and thinking....jesus, this is the beginning of the end

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] otter@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't think it's possible to do on Lemmy without complete structural changes and possibly abandoning activityPub & federation altogether

You can even check who upvoted what with enough work.

Closest you could get would be to change the UI to not display the vote counts, but anyone could get around it by using a different app or UI so it's more of a suggestion

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah lemmy is vulnerable to vote manipulation at its core, and there's virtually nothing anyone can do about it. All the more reason not to care about vote scores, imo.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

The less vote scores matter, the more likely to be accurate they are because there's no motivation to bother manipulating them.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

It's harder to implement things that will influence the psychology of the user and their behaviors (ex. Hiding vote counts for some time, fuzzing the specific values)

But it's also easier to catch bad actors. If you can see who voted on what, you can more easily catch vote manipulation, brigading, or bad faith downvoting

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Nah you can't really trace vote manipulation, because someone manipulating votes can work across multiple instances while admin can only supervise their own instance. They could develop a network of trust (ie user data sharing) between instances, but that would undermine the principles of federation. Even with such a network, there would always be an inherent trust needed for small instances to take part.

Like I say, the best solution is to just accept that internet points don't really matter.

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
113 points (94.5% liked)

General Discussion

11995 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse and Feddit Lemmy Community Browser!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS