99
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by oahi@aussie.zone to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Related:

Watch: The Belmarsh Tribunal on Julian Assange, Press Freedom https://www.democracynow.org/live/watch_live_the_belmarsh_tribunal_on

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Makes one wonder why the US needed to reopen a closed Swiss rape allagation rather then the obvious facts you state. To convince an allied nation to extradite then?

Its fairly clear that the law is a little less direct then you claim when talking extradition.

[-] Klypto@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Correct on that last part.

Why should foreign nations care about US laws? Any extradition by any nation is a courtesy at best.

However it is ludicrous to say US should drop charges.

[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bit more then a curtasy as we have treaties to ensure rules.

But the UK will only do so if it is also a crime here. And not if the death sentence is likely. As our laws prohibit rhat. (For now).

But it is interesting that tue garedian and telegraph also published this data. And the US is ignoring them. Seems more of a power play against the idea of wiki lwaks then any actual risk to the US.

[-] oahi@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago
[-] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Opps.

Honestly i do tend to muddle them up. Also been a few years so will use that as an excuse. Lame one but ah.

this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
99 points (84.6% liked)

World News

32531 readers
495 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS