179
submitted 1 year ago by Mazdak@lemmy.org to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

You still have not explained why the Colorado ruling that he fomented insurrection is wrong. It's sort of looking like you aren't able to. I'm guessing it's because you aren't a legal expert.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

He's zig-zagging his way there.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I will be surprised if I get a response to that, to be honest.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And all he has to do is explain why the Colorado supreme court was wrong. It's so weird that he keeps avoiding that despite being asked directly, isn't it? Surely he's a Constitutional legal scholar.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

You still have not explained why the Colorado ruling that he fomented insurrection is wrong.

Are you placing your trust in the same institutions that are trying to convict the people protesting Pig City on racketeering and terrorism charges?

Or is your mind so thoroughly gouged by liberal brain-rot that fascism becomes perfectly acceptable to you as long as it's approved by the people "higher up" than you?

Do tell... are white lynch mobs technically illegal in the country that enshrines slavery in it's constitution?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You still have not explained why the Colorado ruling is wrong. "Other rulings were wrong" doesn't explain while this ruling is wrong.

Again, I think the answer is you aren't a legal expert despite acting like you are.

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

Are you trusting the same gas(oxygen) that caused an extinction event and is known to kill people when exposed to fire??

what are you? stupid?

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
179 points (92.0% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2800 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS