27
submitted 1 year ago by testeronious@lemmy.world to c/steam@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 year ago

The best take I've read so far is, paraphrased,

"It was an asset flip that got too popular for its own good. Instead of being able to slowly trickle sales over the course of a few months, it got mass purchased and effectively forced their hand."

The idea being that if it hadn't gotten so popular, it would have just been an asset flip to trickle in sales with no long term support or updates. Instead it got so big that and with no real team (dunno about this) there was no way for them to abandon it without this scenario. So better to close for optics than close for a step away from fraud lol.

If that was the intent, then yeah it was a scam regardless. And if it wasn't the intent, then I don't understand their reasoning. I would guess that if it got really popular and sales were coming in, that would incentivize them to continue it rather than closing shop?

this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
27 points (90.9% liked)

Steam

10407 readers
46 users here now

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS