544
no.. just no
(lemmy.ca)
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Better than parameterized queries. Yes, we have stuff like
query("INSERT INTO table(status, name) VALUES ($1, $2);").bind(ent.status).bind(ent.name).execute...
, but that's kind of awful isn't it? With XML queries, we could use any of the XML libraries we have to create and manipulate XML queries without risking 'XML injection'. e.g we could convert ordinary structs/classes into column values automatically without having to use any ORM.I mean, that's just a bad library interface. With a halfway decent interface, you can do something like
No orm required. With tagged templates in JS, you can do
Even wrap it in a function with destructuring to get rid of
ent
:Typescript can add type safety on top of that, of course. And there's the option to prepare a query once and execute it multiple times.
Honestly, the idea of manipulating XML queries, if you mean anything more fancy than the equivalent of parameter injection, sounds over-complicated, but I'd love to see a more concrete example of what you mean by that.
I was thinking along the lines of
Plenty of libraries can build the XML using structs/classes. e.g. with serde:
Or with jackson-dataformat-xml:
I don't do JS (yet) but maybe JSX could also do similar things with XML queries.
No more matching $1, $2, ... (or
?
for mysql) with individual columns, I could dump entire structs/objects into a query and it would work.