214

What is it for?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 8 points 1 year ago

In my day to day life it makes little difference however, despite being an avid reader and writer I struggle tremendously to read aloud.

Thanks, I actually wanted to post that as a question. I would have thought that reading silently would be harder.

[-] adam_y@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I worked as a typesetter for years. I have a rather speedy reading pace (it isn't inate, rather through practice)... but I do wonder if not having to 'hear' words changes the rhythm of reading.

I'm also fascinated if other folk perform accents in their head whilst reading? Do different characters sound different or is there one 'voice' that acts as a narrator?

[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

Do different characters sound different or is there one ‘voice’ that acts as a narrator?

Neither. I think of the idea of the words, rather than hearing the words in my mind. Which is to say, though I can read a sentence and string together the words I read in my mind, the l there is no voice to those words, no gender, no accent, no volume etc.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 12 points 1 year ago

For me different characters have different voices. The narrative is either the voice of the character whose perspective is currently shown (which can lead to conflicts if I don't know the perspective at the start) or it is how I imagine the author to sound like or my own voice.

[-] adam_y@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I won't pretend in not a little jealous of that. I can only imagine the texture that adds to a novel. Plus, it's like a form of creative collaboration... You are present in the text... How cool is that?

[-] aeki@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago

I do read extremely fast in my native language (Spanish). Feels like entire sentences go straight into concepts and my brain builds a whole world based on what I'm reading.

However I started reading in a verbalized way with my second and third languages (English and Swedish) because I was completely useless at pronunciation, while reading at a high level. So I had to learn the sounds and they started invading my reading, which I sort of resent.

But the verbalization is still very mild; faint, monotone, non-enunciated.

Some people talked about poetry and I hadn't considered that my absolute lack of poetry-sense could be related. People have told me about the metrics and whatnot and it really doesn't click. I have to sort of analyze a poem and explain it to myself in prose, and I imagine that defeats the purpose of poetry?

[-] adam_y@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And there's something else I'm interested in. When you think, do you think in a mixture of those languages? Or do you actively translate? Is it a conscious thing?

[-] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago

I natively speak Swedish but I've studied and used English for 4-5 years so I speak English fluently and would consider myself bilingual. I can think in either English or Swedish and I can mix sentences in Swedish and English freely. But I never think in a language that's really a combination of those languages (what we would call svengelska in Swedish).

I'm also studying french and German but I'm not fluent in any of those languages. When using those languages (or at least German) I think in a language that's truly a combination of that language and Swedish/English. I use words from all languages and construct sentences as I would in Swedish (reverse word order for questions, no weird German thing with adjectives at the end etc). This of course becomes a pain as soon as I have to express a thought to someone else.

[-] adam_y@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Absolutely fascinating.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I do wonder if not having to ‘hear’ words changes the rhythm of reading.

Hadn't thought of this...what's your take on poetry, especially meter-forward? Like, Robert W Service or Robert Frost, I feel would be less interesting if they didn't have their beat.

I don't do voices or accents when I read. Everything is in the same 'voice,' which isn't quite the same as my spoken voice. My internal voice enunciates much better and slightly lower pitch. It's more like the voice I wish I had than the voice I do have. :)

[-] adam_y@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Interesting you brought up Service... Grew up reading him as he's from my home town.

I do like poetry, but I'm much more inclined to concrete work, or something closer to what William Burroughs was after.

The shape rather than the rhythm.

Never thought of it that way. Though I still adore Service for the narrative.

I like that your internal monologue is an idealised voice.

[-] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

I am pretty sure it does. From what I've heard people that essentially "read out loud" inside their head tend to have a have a slower reading pace. I don't think Anauralia is necessary to not do that, either.

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, often I'll even have a specific person in mind playing the character: an actor, someone I know, etc. I often don't even realize that I'm doing this

[-] elephantium@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

if not having to ‘hear’ words changes the rhythm of reading.

Poetry instantly comes to mind. I have a very different experience when I silently read poetry vs. reading aloud or listening to someone read it aloud, especially when the poem is written with rhythm in mind.

[-] lordnikon@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

it depends on if I heard a voice of that character before for example Batman is always Kevin Conroy and the joker is always Mark Hamill. another usecase is if I listened to the audio book then start reading a text book. Ray Potter shows up alot.

this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
214 points (95.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36194 readers
809 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS