291

An intruder shot out a window of the Ralph L. Carr Colorado Judicial Center, entered the building, and held an unarmed security guard at gunpoint early Tuesday morning. The suspect was arrested after allegedly firing additional shots and starting a fire inside the building that is the home of the Colorado Supreme Court and the Colorado Court of Appeals.

...

The Colorado Supreme Court made headlines late last year when it ruled that former President Donald Trump is disqualified from holding the presidency under the Constitution's so-called insurrection clause and ordered the secretary of state to exclude his name from the state's Republican presidential primary ballot. That decision has been appealed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 158 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of terrorism without being shot and killed by police. Wow.

Sounds about white.

[-] aew360@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the fuck. Genuinely don’t see how this isn’t a shoot to kill moment unless he voluntarily surrendered

[-] Szymon@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 year ago

It would have been a team-kill, that's why it didn't happen.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I shouldn't have laughed as hard at this as I did. I feel dirty 😅

[-] Webster@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The article mentions he called 911 to surrender about an hour or two after it started.

[-] aew360@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

This is what I get for reading headlines lmao. Thanks, that makes sense. Reality set in quick for this guy

[-] meliaesc@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

He started at 3am too, no danger to anyone but himself + property.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Better to embarrass the man in court than to make him a martyr.

[-] aew360@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Yeah, either way I’m just happy this jackass can’t legally vote anymore

[-] drewofdoom@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You don't lose your right to vote just for being arrested. In Colorado, the person would need to be a convicted, currently-incarcerated felon to lose their right to vote. Felons who have completed their sentences (even if they're out on parole) regain their voting rights.

[-] aew360@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Oh for sure but they have got to have this one locked down tight. I’m no lawyer and even I think I could get a conviction

[-] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I'll be shocked if its classified as terrorism.

this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
291 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2813 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS