253
submitted 11 months ago by Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DLSantini@lemmy.ml 60 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Run updates without me having to worry that "whoops, an update was fucked, and the system is not unbootable anymore. Enjoy the next 6 hours of begging on forums for someone to help you figure out what happened, before being told that the easiest solution is to just wipe your drive and do a fresh install, while you get berated by strangers for not having the entirety of the Linux kernel source code committed to memory."

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 79 points 11 months ago

Just to provide another data point: I've had bad Windows updates render my machine unbootable too.

[-] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 48 points 11 months ago

And then you're left searching for bullshit error messages and potentially unable to fix the problem regardless of your level of expertise.

[-] Siegfried@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

I'm sorry, something went wrong. Here is all the information we can give you about it: ":("

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago

... No you just use Windows built-in rollback feature. Which I think even auto-recovers these days of it detects a failure to boot after an update.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hah! Can someone here chime in and tell me when the slow AF (as in, it can take hours) rollback feature actually worked

Who TF is that patient‽ You can reinstall Windows and all your apps in half the time required.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

As someone who has hundreds of installed programs with tweaks on top of tweaks and hundreds of thousands of files, I always find the suggestion to "just reinstall" beyond laughable.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

I think it recovered my PC for me twice, and it took about ~10 minutes each time at most. Good luck reinstalling everything in that time lol.

[-] verdigris@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago

Windows recovery fails in plenty of circumstances, it's not a magic bullet. Snapshots are like you can do with btrfs, but that's not exactly how Windows recovery works.

[-] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

Of course not, but it works 9/10 times for most people. Enough so that most people never have to deal with a faulty Windows update.

[-] AlphaAutist@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Sure if it fails completely it will, but it doesn’t catch everything. Here’s a related story I have:

At work we had a bunch of Lenovo X1 Carbons running windows that would have the usb-c ports die seemingly randomly on users which was a big problem since that’s also the charging port. There never seemed to be any similar root cause connecting the incidents and Lenovo’s support wasn’t any help. Our entire company is remote but luckily we had onsite support so for a while they would just come by and replace the whole motherboard each time.

Finally one day while scheduling a repair the support guy I was talking to just said, “Oh I’ve seen this before. It’s just a bad update and resetting the CMOS battery by putting a paper clip in this hidden hole fixes it.” We had the user try it out and the ports worked fine again. Apparently they had run some windows updates that failed silently and were causing the hardware issues.

From then on any time a user has had a hardware issue we can’t figure out we just have them try the reset and it has worked every time. This only happens probably 3-4 times a year but we only have less than 40 of these machines so not an insignificant amount.

[-] ademir@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 11 months ago

And Microsoft support that's in fact clueless fanboys.

[-] twei@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

sfc /scannow didn't work? Well too bad, cuz now you gotta reinstall your OS

[-] Whisper06@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 11 months ago

Spoken like someone who doesn’t do stable releases

[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 13 points 11 months ago

I had to literally give up on a windows install that worked itself into an update hole, run the update, cant log in, undo the update, it tries to update at night. Endless cycle, no possible fix.

I don't want to berate you, but just know with enough practice, you'll be able to fix that linux install. Windows wont let you fix it.

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Last time that happened to me was 20 years ago. Am I lucky and this is still common?

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 13 points 11 months ago

Depends on your distro I suppose, I've never ever thought this while using fedora

[-] monotrox@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago

I used to have some problems with manjaro, fedora seems to also be working well for me though

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago

I guess you were using the AUR? Manjaros repos and that don't go well together, had my issues with that too

[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Happened to me last year. I never fully found the root cause, but suspect nvidia drivers may have been an issue. I actually re-partitioned the hdd and put another ubuntu on it to try to fix things. That one booted, but I couldn't un-fuck my old install.

[-] DLSantini@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

I've had this happen to me at least once on every distro I've tried to use long term (longer than let's say a month or two). Most recently was about this time last year. Luckily it was on my second computer, and I was still maintaining a full Windows install on my primary gaming system, so I didn't really lose anything. Just reinstalled Windows on the second computer and tossed it in the closet until I decide what to do with it, and switched back to using the other system for all tasks instead of just gaming.

Conversely, all of the non-desktop systems that run some form of Linux(my NAS TrueNAS, my other NAS running unraid, multiple mini file/web servers, similar systems) are all rock solid. The only one that gets borked regularly, is the little system I use for testing out random shit(mostly Docker stuff) before installing on one of the other systems.

It's about that time of the year where I take a trip around all of the major distros that I've run over the years and see what they look like, and if they have any new features that will compel me to try them out again. Probably start with Garuda, since I really did like their distro list time I tried it out. Maybe I'll intentionally break the system and see how much of a pain in the ass, or not, the default btrfs/snapshot setup they use is.

[-] Whisper06@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago

Only if you aren’t on a stable branch.

[-] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago

Even in the most stable distros I’ve had this issue. We had a RHEL 9 server acting as a graphana kiosk and it failed after an update. Something dbus related. I’d love to know why, as it’s been the only failure we ever had but nonetheless it shakes confidence. Windows 11 updates trashed three servers, one to the point we had a to fly an engineer out. My hope is that immutable distros fix this.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

You might be suffering from the opposite of survivorship bias: When you work in IT you end up having to fix the strangest shit that reoccurs on certain categories of hardware.

I know for a fact that RHEL 7 just did not like certain appliances by vendors that used it (back in the day). They would regularly break themselves until the vendor put out an update that switched it to a Debian-based custom thing.

Also, all the (thousands of) appliances that use Windows are utter shit so it's not really a high bar. The vendor just needs to hire people that actually know what they're doing and if they do they won't use Windows on an appliance!

[-] model_tar_gz@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago
[-] 0_0j@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

My thoughts exactly

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's why I make a btrfs snapshot of my system before every upgrade. Rolling back from a rescue image takes only a minute.

Edit: automatically via the upgrade script

[-] JWBananas@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago

What a great idea! They should automate something like that! Maybe they could call it System Restore?

[-] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I never claimed to have invented the technique.

[-] asret@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago

They're just pointing out that Windows does this too.

[-] feef@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Amen Brother, my experience the last 20+ years

[-] superbirra@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

after 20 years, but usually much sooner, people usually learn to either:

  • what is, and how to stick to stable shit
  • troubleshoot and fix whatever problem happens, often preempting them

maybe it's just not your cup of tea?

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Moving to ublue/silver blue has really been a treat for avoiding this. Oh update borked my system time to boot to last update and wait on that one. I personally really want to get a CI/CD running next for my updates to make sure my specific build and collection of software just works the way I want it too.

[-] Deebster@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

I have an uncle who will assume anything that takes over 20 minutes has crashed so managed to break his Windows box by continually hard resetting as it was trying to apply a large upgrade.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I’ve actually had more issues with Windows doing that. My wifi drivers have stopped working on more than one occasion, and once it just decided to stop recognizing my wife’s hard drive.

this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
253 points (93.5% liked)

Asklemmy

44157 readers
1449 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS