397
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Hyundai and Kia are telling the owners of nearly 92,000 vehicles in the U.S. to park them outside because an electronic controller in an oil pump can overheat and cause fires.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

Do you mean timing belt? (Chains don't go on pulleys) You're supposed to change those... That's just called not maintaining your vehicle

[-] cassetti@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It was a timing chain - it failed somehow and destroyed the engine. It's a well known issue with this specific engine block which is why they stopped making them and they're impossible to find new-in-crate engines for this car.

[-] Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Which year/model or engine? Worth noting many car manufacturers have struggled with timing chain issues on at least one engine. VW struggled with it on more than one engine, BMW, I'm pretty sure there was even a Honda or Toyota engine that had a weak timing chain system at some point. If they actually stopped making the engine because of it, good on them, because other manufacturers (especially VW) definitely don't. Other Hyundai engines have rock solid reputations. One bad experience is called an anecdote, and it's not a good reason to discredit a brand.

[-] cassetti@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It was a Theta II 2.0L FR Turbo MPI (G4KF).

But I'm not just going off my experience. My good friend owns a well known mechanics shop in town, he told us these engines are garbage and he sees it often on these early genesis coupes.

[-] Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah yeah that one wasn't a very good one, it got recalled for crankshaft manufacturing defects and they got sued when the problem ended up being worse than anticipated and the money they set aside wasn't enough. The early genesis coupes were also pretty unreliable in general. Actually, I'd say Hyundai was unreliable in general in the 2000s. They were a mixed bag, the 2009 Elantra had a rock solid drivetrain but crappy electronics for example, and the theta 2 engines were plagued with failures. But pretty much anything 2015+ is rock solid, they seem to have learned from that one.

I didn't realize you were talking about Hyundai as of like 15 years ago, though that should have been obvious since the car in your story was 10 years old

[-] MrShankles@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Ya know, amongst the Hyundai hate, I kinda forgot that my first car was a used 2003 XG350... and I did love that thing. Drove it into the ground, but it really held it's own until I finally had to scrap it in 2017.

I switched to Honda because simple repairs are easier and parts are normally cheaper. And it's just overall, a better and more reliable car. But that xg350 was pretty damn good to me

[-] Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

They were also pretty reliable in the 90s bleeding into the early 2000s lol

[-] MrShankles@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

I think I got lucky with that one. Changing the alternator was a huge pain in my ass, but it mostly performed as expected and was otherwise incredibly reliable. RIP my first car, you were good to me

[-] cassetti@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Lol yeah it was a 2013 Genesis - the last year they were able to use the wings logo before they got sued by bentley and forced to remove it

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
397 points (99.3% liked)

News

23669 readers
3313 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS