102
The M2 Bradley and its crew that recently destroyed a T-90M.
(files.catbox.moe)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
102 points (99.0% liked)
Ukraine
8370 readers
499 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
❗ Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
For anyone who doesn't get the significance, these crazy cats took out a modern main battle tank with an armored personnel carrier. That's like if the Bismark was sunk by the Titanic.
Infantry Fighting Vehicle not APC.
Still impressive since they liked with the autocannon instead of the anti tank missiles M2 can be equiped for that purpose.
Yeah, that's the official name, but I'll stick to the APC designation. It carries troops. It's armored. It does not have a tank-level main gun. It's an armored personnel carrier. A good one, but an APC, none the less.
I disagree. APCs and IFVs have different roles. APCs are just troop taxis. IFVs carry troops and fight alongside them or can do scouting actions like this one.
With the chaingun, nonetheless.
You'd think they'd use the anti-tank rocket to kill the tank. Not the chaingun.
Wait they killed it with the gun? I saw the video but assumed they had used one of the rockets. I had no clue it was even possible to make a T-90 (or any MBT) explode like that from the gun alone.
The M2 Bradley still fires depleted uranium rounds, albeit "little ones" (not like a real tank gun).
But given how close the two vehicles were, the Chaingun was possibly the better choice, and you can see the results. The issue with the chaingun is that you need to be very close before that weapon is effective, because drag on the bullets slows them down dramatically (meanwhile, the tank's bigger gun has more range and power due to the shear size + mass + momentum, so tanks can shoot depleted uranium rounds much further and more effectively). Its just simple physics, the smaller gun and bullets from the M2 puts them at a severe disadvantage in this fight.
This combat footage is exceptionally rare. Not only is it a M2 vs T90 (a fight the M2 was supposed to run away from), its an incredibly rare situation where the chaingun was the right choice to use.
I don't think the M2 Crew were necessarily going for a tank kill. The T90 is theoretically supposed to have armor that protects it from these shots. But even if you can't break the T90's armor, you can damage the main-gun, the treads, the cameras, the sensors, the infrared, and other equipment that's "outside the tank".
I'm sure the big explosion where the M2 Chaingun destroys the whole thing was as much a surprise to the M2 crew as it was to the rest of us (and the internet).
To be fair, I'd like to see the evidence of this "kill", as the facts I currently have in front of me lean toward mostly blinding it, instead.
edit: as an ex-artillery commander friend of mine pointed out, why is the 25cal gun that fired those rounds missing from this photo?
Hmm...
Wasn't the story that the light gun set off the explosive armor attachments to blind it?
No, the tank's smoke grenades cooked off, that's all. The consistent fire chewed up the sensors on the exterior, for sure, but that's not a "catastrophic kill", the tanks just blind (which is a completely shit place to be, sure, but not a kill in and of itself).
Yeah they downed it with the Bushmaster APFSDS rounds. Took like A LOT of rounds though haha.
They didn't down it. 🤦🏼♂️
Not a kill.