Why the Guardian's 'Hamas mass rape' story doesn't pass the sniff test (jonathancook.substack.com)

submitted 11 months ago by davel@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 11 months ago

Ah yes, even if there are no evidences it must have happened because there is some law of physics that there can't be war without mass rape I guess.

Also, we're not just talking about one or two soldiers but of an alledged mass rape which I repeat, there is no evidence for.

[-] AnarchoBolshevik@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No no no no no no, there’s loads of evidence: thousands of hours of videos, testimonies, and photographs. I know that we can’t access any of it yet, but trust me: the mostly unnamed experts got the evidence, they’ve assured us that they got it, and I’m sure that eventually they’ll release all of it to the public, just like the evidence for all those Serbian rape camps and the Viagra‐injected Libyan rapists. Just give them a little more time!

[-] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 5 points 11 months ago

Isn't that what Biden said about video footage of 40 beheaded babies? "I saw it with my own eyes. I mean, no I didn't, one of my aides saw it and told me it was real".