126
submitted 11 months ago by leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

From their Masto acct:

"It’s almost #DataPrivacyWeek - vote now for your favorite data privacy tools in this 1-minute survey! "

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

ISPs pass on your data to various authorities in quite a lot of countries. My own country (UK) has such a terrible privacy reputation I wouldn't be at all surprised to find ISP's hand over data for every request.

[-] driveway@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 months ago

Billion dollar business idea: ISP but its not run by scum.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

God it feels good to have some of the only municipal fiber in the U.S.. gigabit symetric for a flat $60/mo, never get ads from them, price is always the same, never gone down, speeds are largely as advertised... there's even a 2.5 gig and 10 gig option. once i have the hardware for it I'm looking at the 2.5 gig. right now I'm almost saturating my 1 gig with jellyfin and stuff, but if I get some more hardware I'm looking at using it to properly get in on the self hosting scene finally.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago

Its a double edged sword. You don't want the government to be the ISP but banning community broadband is silly. It should be perfectly legal and acceptable for a bunch if neighbors to get together and make there own network. It could function like a community garden.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Why is a private business inherently better than the government as an ISP, though?

Either way it has to follow all relevant local laws about how to behave. The ISPs will respond to law enforcement requests either way. But at least a public entity will also need to be accountable to the public and respond to things like FOIA, as opposed to a private entity which has all kinds of ways to resist transparency and is more accountable to the shareholders.

Either way it is a near natural monopoly because running redundant wires/fiber is a waste of resources. There won't be much consumer choice.

The idea that the government would be inherently inefficient is one that presumes a private entity that is highly insulated from market force wouldn't. Free markets create a lot of pressure to improve products, but there's no free market happening in a utility like an ISP. Even in the most competitive markets, that's still choosing one from maybe 4 providers that barely compete with each other at all. And you have to sign longterm contracts with all kinds of complex pricing to "test" the competition, and testing it requires pretty advanced knowledge beyond most users -- if you have no freedom to easily change your ISP, there's just not any competition.

If the sword is double-edged, one of those edges is safe enough for a renfair.

[-] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Yep, same here. Its almost trivial for ISPs to hand over data to the govt on any invented basis. They also do so to any business or company that asks for it, but they will charge them fees AKA selling data.

Worst part is there is no oversight, and there really is no segment of population that cares about privacy to raise this as an issue either.

[-] onion@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

How do UK based VPNs differ?

this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
126 points (98.5% liked)

Privacy

32492 readers
297 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS