363

Sublinks Aims to Be a Drop-In Replacement for Lemmy (wedistribute.org)

submitted 11 months ago by deadsuperhero@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

308 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Seems like an interesting effort. A developer is building an alternative Java-based backend to Lemmy's Rust-based one, with the goal of building in a handful of different features. The dev is looking at using this compatibility to migrate their instance over to the new platform, while allowing the community to use their apps of choice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] derin@lemmy.beru.co 3 points 11 months ago

Just you wait until your developers learn about the var keyword - it's going to be Python 2.7 PTSD incidents all over again 😂

[-] Rooki@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Isnt that already default on all variables? Its like a var(in js)?

[-] derin@lemmy.beru.co 1 points 11 months ago

Nope, was added to dot Net after the fact. Normally you declare each type by hand, e.g.

ArrayList<int> myCoolList = new ArrayList<int>();

var myCoolList = new ArrayList<int>();

The second example is why the keyword was added, but now imagine you have a function call returning an unknown type, and then things will start to get super funky.

E.g.

var myCoolBook = BuildBookData(input);

...one step forward and then the same step back 😂 (disclaimer: I do actually like C#, though)

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

The good thing about the var keyword is that it’s still statically typed. The IDE can figure out the type for you if you hover over it.

[-] derin@lemmy.beru.co 1 points 11 months ago

But what happens if you don't use an IDE? That was the original point. Even if it isn't statically typed, a python IDE can also do its best to guess the type of an object.

The point is to have code that's legible without dependence on large, third party tools.

[-] Rooki@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Ahh you mean the implementation of var in other langauges than python, i missunderstood you there! Yeah var is a bit risky to use in that case, same i like c# too! Its pretty reliable and stable.

[-] derin@lemmy.beru.co 2 points 11 months ago

Yep, I was specifically talking about C#'s implementation.

I worked with some large C# code bases, and you could always see the point in time in which an individual developer would finally get comfortable with var - it's when the code would start getting unreadable. 🤣