985
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Lemme whisper in your ear, "The sidewalks are getting redone with paver stones, the intersections are getting raised to sidewalk level, and the bike lanes will connect directly with a larger protected bike lane network and directly to an in-progress new automated light metro station that will have 2.5-minute headways."

[-] Lepsea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Bro please stop it, I can't ejaculate anymore.

[-] jiji@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

What’s the benefit of paver sidewalks? I would think they’d be harder to keep clear of snow, like I know people with brick/paver drives and they’re less easy to shovel. Plus more points to become unsettled/uneven and have edges come up for tripping. I assume there’s positives I’m missing!

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They've already installed some in my neighborhood, and they have a very smooth, even surface. Beyond that, I think it's just an aesthetic thing: create really attractive, pleasant spaces and you'll attract more pedestrians. And of you're in a dense neighborhood, the local tax revenues are more than enough to afford nicer surfaces than if you're having to cover a ton of sprawling suburbia.

[-] flint5436@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They also feel they are less slippery when it rains and allow rainwater to seep into the ground directly rather than direkt it to the sewers. This unburdens the sewer system and the humitity in the ground helps cool cities.

[-] CCatMan@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

What about stamped concrete?

[-] jiji@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for your response!! I agree they’re aesthetically better, by a mile! I was just worried about their functional practicality.

[-] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] MBM@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

Awesome! I just got back from Montreal. The impression we (Europeans) got was that it's pretty car-centric and the nicest parts of the city are used for parking lots, but it's better than, say, Toronto. Nice to hear it's improving.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's probably the most urbanist major city in North America (except NYC, but that's in a league of its own), but even with that it's still got way too many cars. Best thing about it, though, is that the populace is pretty pro-urbanism, and we got a very pro-density and pro-transit mayor and city council.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
985 points (96.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9809 readers
565 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS