46

Do democracies sustain attacks from dictatorships because of this possible vulnerability ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] IdiosyncraticIdiot@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago

Freedom of speech absolutely results in the right for me to insult people...?

Is it rude? Maybe.

Is it illegal? Absolutely not

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 11 months ago

yeah, he had me til that. the right to insult is near absolute...kinda at the core of freedom of speech.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

Up to a point. When it crosses into harassment, slander, or libel, that freedom can be limited.

While slander and libel are civil issues rather than criminal, that is still a government based limitation on speech/expression.

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Yes, Walter, you're right, but you're also an asshole!

[-] TheInsane42@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Are you alowed to insult a person, yes absolutely, but it only proves you're an absolute asshole. ;)

You can even state you think an ethnic group is bad. You can't state the same ethnic group is trash and should be whatever. That's discrimination and not allowed in democratic or even civilised societies.

In democratic/liberal societies you solve your differences via debate. The result may even be that the parties don't like each other, but as long as they can decide to live in peace together it's alright. Agree to disagree and continue to live your life is fine, trying to harm others isn't.

[-] IdiosyncraticIdiot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

In democratic/liberal societies you solve your differences via debate

We have too little of this in our current society, I feel like. "Debates" are often just screaming matches and it's really annoying and holds back progress on all ends I fell like.

Also I wasn't vouching for being an asshole, just pointing out it's not illegal XD

[-] whenigrowup356@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I'd argue that debates aren't useful without a neutral, mutually trusted media source that listeners from both sides would refer to for fact-checking. The US has debates but the soundbites that partisan media air are the main way people consume them. Few people watch the whole debate, and few want to because they're mostly just hot air.

Plus, one candidate can use the debate to lie out of their ass and at least one media source will follow that up by spitting out misleading info to support the lies.

I don't mean to both-sides this, obviously right wing media is more egregious on this front. But their captured audience tuning out fact-checks from other media is maybe the bigger problem.

All of this happening on the sidelines fundamentally alters the purpose of a debate. For example, changing the tone and style of interaction; people aren't trying to come to an agreement or win over new supporters, just shout over someone to get in soundbites that can be replayed by their team.

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
46 points (88.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36188 readers
1352 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS