452
Democrats urge Biden administration to deschedule marijuana
(www.nbcnews.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
452 points (98.5% liked)
politics
19254 readers
2280 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
That's a risk I'm willing to take.
There are such things as acting chiefs as well. I keep firing them until we got somebody favorable
Trump tried to do that to get an attorney general who would help him out. It did not go well.
What do you mean it didn't turn out well? Seems like there were actually zero consequences. I love that Trump was allowed to use the awesome powers of the president to hurt people, but Biden's not allowed to use them to help people. That's where the line is, apparently.
It's more akin to Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre, where he kept ordering the next Attorney General successor to fire a special prosecutor until someone finally did it. This finally convinced Congress to get off their ass and start the impeachment process. Republicans then spent the next few decades building a system to make sure a Republican President would never have to face consequences like that again.
Right, that's kind of my point. Presidents can do a whole lot to cover their own ass and do illegal activities, but they can't do anything to help the people, such as decriminalizing marijuana.
It's a gross double standard.
Some of us think that kind of thing is unacceptable no matter who the president is.
Do you find it more objectionable than locking people up for marijuana possession, ruining their lives? I dont
Changing the DEA scheduling well change things a lot less than you seem to think. It's states that lock people up for simple possession, not the federal government.
Apart from the consequence of Trump being unable to stay in office after declaring the election a fraud. Which is why he kept firing them.
Are you implying that by doing something incredibly popular would cause electoral consequences for Biden? Because what you just listed was that Trump lost the election. He faced no fruitful systemic challenges to anything he did ever.
I'm saying that firing AG after AG did not get Trump what he wanted, so I don't know why you think it would work in this case.
Right, I'm just saying that the context is incredibly important. It is a popular political maneuver.
The point is that if Biden ordered it, it's likely that this DEA chief would oblige. We've created this hypothetical where they just won't for some reason. And then that's when you strong arm.
I'm just really tired of nothing good happening ever because we lack the creativity.