490
submitted 11 months ago by Ephera@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grue@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago

> implying there's a "right way" to build an SPA.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago

There are a lot of standard practices like… using a router to load the content of your SPA according to the url.

[-] grue@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What I'm saying is, there's no right way to build a thing that is inherently wrong.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You could build it with no input sanitation. That’s wrong.

[-] grue@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago

Even a perfectly-built SPA is a thing that should've been a different kind of program (a native app or even something like Java Web Start) instead.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago

I strongly disagree, but I respect your opinion which was no doubt formed by different experiences with web technologies than I’ve had.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Not that it’s inherently good or bad, but the heavier web apps get the more a browser represents a sort of virtualization environment that only runs one stack. I think that’s interesting.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

What do you mean only runs one stack? Like front end framework? That would be the point. But it can communicate with any backend.

[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 4 points 11 months ago

There's no one right way. Saying there are wrong ways doesn't imply the existence of one right way, though.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
490 points (94.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32822 readers
230 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS