112
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The Ukraine-born winner of the Miss Japan beauty pageant has given up her crown after a tabloid report revealed her affair with a married man.

Karolina Shiino, 26, was crowned Miss Japan two weeks ago but her win sparked public debate due to her heritage.

While some welcomed the naturalised citizen's crowning, others said she didn't represent traditional Japanese beauty ideals.

Amid the furore, a local magazine published an expose alleging an affair.

The article in the Shukan Bunshun reported that Ms Shiino had engaged in a relationship with a married influencer and doctor. The man has not provided any public comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 11 months ago

She wasn’t the one having the affair. He was.

But of course it falls upon women to ensure a husband’s fidelity, because we men are all slobbering troglodytes without a will of our own, only an incessant craving for cunt. Or something.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 18 points 11 months ago

I thought some of my slobber was addling my brain - you had me check Wikipedia:

An affair is a sexual relationship, romantic friendship, or passionate attachment in which at least one of its participants has a formal or informal commitment to a third person who may neither agree to such relationship nor even be aware of it.

Perhaps you use a more limited definition. Anybody else agree with VZQ? (Only talking semantics.)

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 months ago

The way I use the word, the entire relationship is the affair, but only the cheater is having an affair.

YMMV of course.

[-] HollandJim@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago

I bet you use “the cheatin’ spoon” distinction too. /s

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

The person who committed to a monogamous relationship is at fault - not the unattached person. When you enter into a monogamous relationship you agree to a contract with your partner even though you know you'll, at times, be tempted to violate it. Cheaters are fucking assholes but "home wreckers" aren't seducing their partner to do anything they wouldn't do anyway. Don't be a jerk and purposefully try to pursue someone in a monogamous relationship... but if it happens it's the person violating their relationship rules that should carry the vast majority of the blame.

Just as a historical aside "the other woman" was often considered at fault because... you guessed it misogyny! The husband couldn't be at fault it was a temptress that lured him to do wrong. We're moving beyond this impression as a society but you'll still see it occasionally.

And, if you think monogamy won't work for you then be up front about wanting an open relationship... this isn't the 1800s, it's perfectly acceptable to have a non-monogamous relationship... just respect your fucking partner(s).

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

just respect your fucking partner(s).

Not too bad to extend that to “respect people” eh? Fellow sufferers of the human condition.

We’re all adults, we all know hurt - I’d feel guilty if I were involved with a cheater, and I think that’s a good thing for humanity.

Glad we’re leaving that temptress narrative behind for sure.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Oh, definitely, respect everyone... but if you enter into a monogamous relationship then especially respect your partner. And the unattached person should feel guilty if they knowingly let themselves be used to violate a relationship... but they remain the less guilty party.

[-] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The husband couldn’t be at fault it was a temptress that lured him to do wrong. We’re moving beyond this impression as a society but you’ll still see it occasionally.

We should move away from it but we should be aware that it's ingrained in our genetics and emotional responses. A man sleeping with married women is a reproductive strategy that paid of many times - reproduction without material cost. A women in a materially stable marriage that is sleeping with a beautiful or strong man is improving her genetic lineage too. And the balance of power for sexual selection is somewhat wonky.

I'm not advocating any naturalist bullshit but we inherit some icky garbage from our evolution and evolved some social behaviors to deal with them (e.g. stoning adulterers). Some behavioral patterns and emotional responses won't go away easily and can't be easily negated using purely intellectual arguments.

My point is that it's at least ok to find Karolina Shiino less popular after knowing she had an affair. Especially for something as superficial and primitive as a beauty contest.

as a temptress that lured him to do wrong. We’re moving beyond this impression as a society but you’ll still se

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Yeah, that's a discussion you won't win.

I've tried everything from "she's not the one who promised loyalty" to the fact they were two consenting adults so mind your own business.

Blame the cheater, not the person who they cheated with, I fully agree - but I think lemmy and reddit have been cheated on a few too many times.

[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

In Japan, you can be on the hook (sued) for knowingly engaging in a relationship with someone you know to be married. It's usually about breaking up the marriage, from what I understand. Sex of the people involved doesn't matter here.

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago

Oh wow, you are right! They have civil liability for adultery. That’s wild.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

An affair still involves two people (or more!) even if only one is married

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 11 months ago
[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

No, she got some dick.

The extra marital affair was him.

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 11 months ago
[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

You said she wasn’t, but she was.

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

I did not. I said she was not having an affair.

She was in an affair, but it’s was the dude having it.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca -2 points 11 months ago

Hmmmm… does it work like that?

Yeah I suppose so. Stupid English.

[-] Lath@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Politics are always ugly. We should get rid of them altogether.

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago

This is a giant non sequitur.

[-] Lath@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

We should get rid of that as well then.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

We should also get rid of this guy - they want to get rid of a lot of shit and that's disruptive.

[-] Lath@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Yes, get rid of everything. For peace of mind.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Reject universe, go back to pre-bang non-existence.

[-] Lath@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Ah, if it weren't but a dream...

this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
112 points (81.1% liked)

World News

39504 readers
1718 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS